Tourists and an Empire State Building employee at the iconic tourist attraction in Manhattan. The writer argues that the Trump administration has only marginally impacted tourism to the U.S. Lien T. / Empire State Building
People in the travel business have been warning that the Donald Trump administration’s isolationist rhetoric and tougher border controls — as evidenced by the just-unveiled State Department questionnaire that asks visa applicants for 15 years of biographical information and their social media handles for the past five years — are going to discourage foreign travelers from coming to the U.S.
Some have even put forward evidence that this is already happening. Mobile app Foursquare, for example, reported last week that, among its users:
The share of international tourism to leisure locations in America has been steadily declining since October 2016, after small YoY growth in August and September. Over the full October 2016 to March 2017 timeframe, there was an average decrease of 11% YoY.
ForwardKeys, a travel data provider, reported Thursday that summer bookings for travel to the U.S. are down 3.5 percent over last year — while bookings are up for all other major destinations.
So I was curious whether the jobs data released this week by the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed any indication yet of an employment slowdown brought on by this newfound unpopularity of the U.S. I figured “accommodation” would be the likeliest industry category to be hit. It hasn’t been … yet.
Employment growth in accommodation did stall last year — perhaps an indication of the impact of Airbnb, whose self-employed hosts don’t show up in the payroll data — but the past few months actually saw a modest return to growth.
Another place to look is the consumer spending data released Monday by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, which breaks out spending by foreign travelers in the U.S.
That does seem to show a slowdown since last fall, although not much of one. All of these numbers, especially the spending ones, are subject to revision as more data comes in. And in general, we’ll know a lot more in a few months. Still, there is no sign yet of the kind of dramatic falloff in travel to the U.S. that followed Sept. 11 or the 2008 financial crisis. There may be a negative Trump effect on tourism to the U.S., but at this point it seems more likely to be a modest drag than an anvil to the head.
Also apparent, though, is that travel — and foreign travel — really does matter to the U.S. economy. Those 1.96 million people working in accommodation in May dwarfed the 655,000 employed in what seems to be the current administration’s favorite industry: mining and oil and gas extraction.
The lodging jobs don’t pay nearly as well ($14.31 to $28.31 an hour for production and nonsupervisory employees), and mining and drilling for oil and gas creates employment in other industries such as refining, plastics and metals manufacturing. But the $219 billion that foreigners spent in the U.S. last year on travel, education and medical services isn’t far off the $265 billion gross domestic product contribution of mining and oil and gas.
Tourism matters. We may find out over the next few years just how much it matters.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Justin Fox is a Bloomberg View columnist. He was the editorial director of Harvard Business Review and wrote for Time, Fortune and American Banker. He is the author of “The Myth of the Rational Market.”
- It consists mainly of hotels and motels but also includes bed-and-breakfasts, RV parks, campgrounds and rooming houses.
©2017 Bloomberg L.P.
PRC Time Shares
Author: Ryan Wolkov
Powered by WPeMatico